Road Safety and Financial Protection: Third-Party Insurance Mandate under Section 146 (MV ACT, 1988) in India and Global Context

Road Safety and Financial Protection: Third-Party Insurance Mandate under Section 146 in India and Global Context

Introduction

Third-party insurance is a critical component of motor vehicle regulation globally. It serves to protect victims of road accidents by ensuring that they receive compensation for injuries, fatalities, or property damage. In India, Section 146 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, mandates compulsory third-party insurance for all motor vehicles. This article delves into the meaning, definition, effectiveness, and global perspective of third-party insurance, with a focus on the Indian context, supported by examples and case laws

Meaning and Definition

Third Party Insurance is an insurance policy that covers:

  • Bodily Injuries or Death: Compensation to third parties injured or killed in an accident involving the insured vehicle.
  • Property Damage: Compensation for damage to third-party property caused by the insured vehicle.

Section 146 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, specifically states:

  • No person shall use, except as a passenger, or cause or allow any other person to use, a motor vehicle in a public place unless there is in force a policy of insurance complying with the requirements of this Chapter.

Effectiveness in the Indian System

The mandate of third-party insurance in India aims to provide a safety net for accident victims and protect vehicle owners from substantial financial liabilities.

Key Objectives:

  1. Protection of Accident Victims: Ensures that victims of road accidents receive timely compensation.
  2. Financial Security for Vehicle Owners: Shields vehicle owners from the financial burdens of third-party claims.
  3. Legal Compliance: Encourages compliance with traffic regulations and reduces the incidence of uninsured vehicles.

Implementation and Challenges

Availability and Affordability:

  • Premium Costs: The affordability of third-party insurance premiums remains a contentious issue. High premiums can lead to a significant number of uninsured vehicles, particularly among low-income vehicle owners.
  • Insurance Penetration: Despite the mandate, a large number of vehicles in India remain uninsured, partly due to a lack of awareness and enforcement challenges.

Coverage Issues:

  • Comprehensive vs. Affordable Coverage: Balancing comprehensive coverage with affordable premiums is challenging. Insufficient coverage can leave victims inadequately compensated, while high premiums can deter vehicle owners from purchasing insurance.

Claims and Fraud:

  • Claims Settlement: Efficient and timely claims settlement processes are essential to ensure that victims receive compensation without undue delays.
  • Fraudulent Claims: Preventing fraudulent claims is a significant challenge, requiring robust verification and investigation mechanisms.

Case Laws and Examples

  1. Smt. Savitri Devi vs. Ramesh Chand and Ors. (2011): This case highlighted the importance of third-party insurance. The Delhi High Court ruled that the vehicle owner was liable to pay compensation to the accident victim due to the absence of a valid third-party insurance policy.
  1. SC Mandate on Long-term Insurance (2018): The Supreme Court of India mandated a compulsory long-term third-party insurance cover for all new vehicles to ensure continuous insurance coverage and reduce the number of uninsured vehicles on the road.
  2. Rajendra Singh vs. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. (2020): The Supreme Court emphasized the importance of fair and timely settlement of claims, ruling that insurance companies must not delay the process and must honor genuine claims promptly.

Global Perspective

United States:

  • Mandatory Liability Insurance: Most states require liability insurance. Minimum coverage limits vary, and uninsured motorist coverage is required in some states.
  • Case Example: In State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Campbell (2003), the U.S. Supreme Court highlighted the importance of fair practices in insurance claims.

United Kingdom:

  • Third Party Insurance Requirement: Legal requirement for all vehicles. The UK has stringent enforcement mechanisms, with severe penalties for uninsured drivers.
  • Case Example: In Road Traffic Act 1988, uninsured drivers face significant penalties, including fines and disqualification from driving.

Australia:

  • Compulsory Third Party (CTP) Insurance: Required for all vehicles, covering bodily injury to people involved in an accident.
  • Case Example: In Nominal Defendant v. GLG Australia Pty Ltd. (2006), the High Court of Australia dealt with issues related to uninsured vehicles and compensation claims.

Germany:

  • (Liability Insurance): Mandatory for all vehicles, covering both property damage and bodily injuries.
  • Case Example: German courts have consistently upheld the importance of mandatory liability insurance, ensuring that victims are compensated fairly.

Conclusion

Third-party insurance, mandated by Section 146 of the Indian Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, is crucial for ensuring financial protection for accident victims and vehicle owners. While its implementation faces challenges related to affordability, coverage, and fraud, the mandate plays a vital role in enhancing road safety and legal compliance. The global perspective underscores the universal recognition of the importance of third-party insurance in protecting road users and promoting responsible driving. As India continues to evolve its regulatory framework, addressing these challenges will be key to achieving a more effective and comprehensive insurance system. Road Safety and Financial Protection: Third-Party Insurance Mandate under Section 146 in India and Global Context


/www.thehindu.com/news/national/govt-to-provide-cashless-treatment-for-road-crash-victims/article67951745.ece

https://www.indiacode.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/9460/1/a1988-59.pdf

Follow Us


Discover more from Easy Notes 4U Academy

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a Reply