Teaching and Childhood Pedagogy Theories
If you’ve spent any time teaching, then you know there are countless ways to approach a subject. And no one (or two, or five) way(s) to teach a student. You probably also have a few of your own favorite methods and a variety of ways in which you’ve “reached” your students. As you continue to teach, your style as a teacher will start to emerge. And while some elements of your teaching style will likely stick with you through your teaching career, the countless assessments, workshops, and moments of private development will at times prompt changes in your teaching style. But how should one know the right ways to change how one teaches? Well, this depends on your views about how students learn. Luckily you can build “on the backs of giants” here, as there have been many (no doubt you know) brilliant thinkers in educational psychology, child development, and pedagogy. We’ve outlined a few of our favorites below. Teaching and Childhood Pedagogy Theories
1.) Jean Piaget Theory of Cognitive Development
- What he’s known for: Piaget theory of cognitive development
- Educational Application: Early Childhood Education
- When: 1920s
Jean Piaget became a psychologist circa 1918, and is known for his research in child psychology. Initially, Piaget theorized that child development was more than just biological development and in fact was also intellectual. From his early research, Piaget developed the four stages of his theory of cognitive development. The four stages move chronologically through a child’s life, and are:
1. Sensorimotor Stage
The Sensorimotor Stage is the earliest stage from birth to age two. Here Piaget states that the infant to baby is experiencing the world through their senses and through their movement including their…
Featured Programs
- simple reflexes like sucking
- forming habits and primary circular reactions like thumb sucking
- coordinating circular reactions- a more behaviors, and an understanding of object permanence
- novelty and curiosity- an exploratory stage that happens from 12 months to 18 months old.
- the baby creates a “blueprint” of its patterns and findings from 18 months to year two
2. Preoperational Stage
The Preoperational Stage lasts from when the child begins to speak (typically around age 2) through to age 7. During this phase you will see an increase in physical play and imaginative play. Children will still have some difficulty seeing things from different points of view, so be careful with “how do you think I feel?” expectations. This stage is subdivided as such:
- Symbolic FunctionFrom ages 2-4 children use symbols to help identify and make sense of the world around them. An example of this is the common drawing of the family members as big as a house.
- Intuitive ThoughtFrom ages 4-7 children begin asking a number of questions. Children begin to reason and therefore want to know more. Conversations begin to form.
3. Concrete Operational Stage
The Concrete Operational Stage takes place from ages 7-11. Children can now take on the perspectives of others, and are much more aware of logic, will converse with other about novel topics, and begin to problem solve.
4. Formal Operational Stage
The Formal Operational Stage takes place from ages 11-16. We think this could also be called the “Little Plato” stage as children and teens begin to understand abstract thought, and metacognition (AKA “thinking about thinking; knowing about knowing”). Children and teens can problem solve across multiple steps. The formal operational stages carries on beyond ages 16.
Piaget’s protégé: Seymour Papert
Piaget had an enormous impact on artificial intelligence, but how? Well, Seymour Papert is one link. Papert was a renowned computer scientist and mathematician who used Piaget’s stages when developing language programming. Remember that mouthing baby that then learned to babble, talk, and then have conversation? Language programming too makes those leaps thanks to Papert’s translation of Piaget into the Logo programming language. Students were encouraged in a sense to follow the turtle’s developmental stages and try to predict what it will do next. Not sure what we’re talking about? It’s okay! Logo was designed in 1967 and thus is only really an infant stage of language programming. Well, we had to start somewhere, and many theorize that where we started was actually with Piaget.
2.) Howard Gardner Theory of Multiple Intelligences
- What he’s known for: Gardner’s theory of multiple intelligences
- Educational Application: All Learning Stages
- When: 1980s- present
Howard Gardner theorized that there was more than meets the I(Q) test when discussing “intelligence.” He argued that the IQ test was far too narrow- focusing primarily on linguistic and mathematical abilities and ignoring other areas of the child’s intelligence. In 1983 Gardner wrote his flagship book Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. When wiring this important work, Gardner had exceptional learners in mind including people who were than termed “savants” as well other exceptional individuals. He proposed eight abilities (Gardner added naturalistic in the 90s) and later suggested a ninth. Though the original 7 and then 8 are as follows:
- 1.Musical-Rhythmic
- 2. Visual-Spatial
- 3. Verbal-Linguistic
- 4. Logical-Mathematical
- 5. Bodily-Kinesthetic
- 6. Interpersonal
- 7. Intrapersonal
- 8. Naturalistic
The ninth proposed intelligence is Existential-Moral. We wonder if intuition should be included for an even 10. Let’s digress, and take a closer look at the essential 8 components from Gardner’s original theory. Teaching and Childhood Pedagogy Theories
Musical-Rhythmic and Harmonic Intelligence
Musical-Rhythmic and Harmonic Intelligence is described as a type of intelligence that is highly musical with sensitivity to sound, and rhythm. This individual may have relative or perfect pitch, easily create melody, can sing, play multiple instruments, and has a sensitivity to timbre or how something sounds. You may hear someone say “She just has a natural ear!” They are referring to musical-rhythmic and harmonic intelligence.
Visual-Spatial Intelligence
The person with Visual-Spatial intelligence is that person who can see for example a geometric shape and then, turn it, flip it, spin it and more all within their mind’s eye. Have you ever seen There is an entire branch of psychology known as “Spatial Intelligence Psychology” that discusses this type of intelligence in depth.
Verbal-Linguistic Intelligence
Those with high levels of Verbal-Linguistic intelligence will be great with words, phenomenal story-tellers, and great readers and writers.
Logical-Mathematical Intelligence
Logical-Mathematical Intelligence involves problem solving through reason. Those with high levels of this type of intelligence may be epistemologists, or mathematicians. A Vulcan is said to have high levels of logical-mathematical intelligence. Well, it is only logical, after all.
Bodily-Kinesthetic Intelligence
When you think of bodily-kinesthetic intelligence you probably instantly think of an Olympic athlete among the top of the list, and you would be correct! Actors, builders, and dancers all have a sense of timing and awareness of their body and learn best potentially just “going through the motions.”
INTERpersonal Intelligence
The persons with high levels of Interpersonal Intelligence can readily empathize with others’ emotions and motivations. A good teacher often has high levels of interpersonal intelligence and can empathize with what a student may experience. It’s a high-level of perspective taking and understanding. Do you remember that teacher that seemed to be able to read your mind? She most-likely was using her interpersonal intelligence.
INTRApersonal Intelligence
γνῶθι σεαυτόν or “know thyself” is a Greek phrase that captures intrapersonal intelligence. The type of person who really knows about themselves probably seems like a sage. This person know all about their inner states, as well as their carnal needs. In Ancient Egypt those entered the external temple only when ready to learn more and acquire insights. Have you ever seen a person who just seems to know when to speed up, slow down, and “just be?” That person most likely has honed their intrapersonal intelligence. It may come as no surprise the study of self was a core topic for the ancient Greek philosophers.
Naturalistic Intelligence
Gardner added Naturalistic Intelligence a decade later in the 1990s. As is implied, a personal with high levels of naturalistic intelligence is “tuned in” with nature. Once burnt at the stake, the “witches” of ancient Europe are perfect examples of women with high levels of natural intelligence. These women were botanists in their own right, and could more than just identify plants but also could wield them for healing. Many herbalists living today talk about walking among the plants and listening to them talk before picking them and using them in home remedies- always thanking the plants for their help in the process.
Gardner’s protégé: Carol Ann Tomlinson
When Gardner created his theory of multiple intelligences, he was heavily motivated by children and other learners with exceptionalities. Who is to say that someone with autism is not intelligent? Well, once upon a time, this was the case. While we can’t possibly list everyone who has been influenced by his theory, we can say that there are educators who strongly emphasize the importance of differentiating their lesson plans to meet the needs of all types of minds. Carol Ann Tomlinson is among the top authors on differentiation in the classroom. She writes extensively about practical ways to remain relevant in the classroom by teaching to students with diverse abilities and cultural backgrounds. Teaching and Childhood Pedagogy Theories
3.) David H. Rose: Founder of CAST: Defined the Universal Design for Learning (UDL)
- What he’s known for: the Center for Applied Special Technology (CAST)
- Educational Application: Special Education; Educational Technology
- When: 1980s-present
David H. Rose is the co-founder of CAST who in the mid-80’s worked to improve education for all types of learners through technology. His work lead to the Universal Design for Learning (UDL) which influenced education policy throughout the US including the reauthorization of IDEA in 2004. The UDL framework calls for these three general principles when designing a classroom curriculum:
- “Multiple means of representation to give learners various ways of acquiring information and knowledge”
- “Multiple means of expression to provide learners alternatives for demonstrating what they know”
- Multiple means of engagement to tap into learners’ interests, challenge them appropriately, and motivate them to learn
Source: Teaching Every Student in the Digital Age
Additionally, UDL is heavily steeped in the field of neuroscience and so the learning framework identifies which areas of the brain are responsible for various components of learning including the:
- Recognition Networks which are how we gather information, and place that information into categories like numbers, letters, words etc.
- Strategic Networks are how we plan and then perform our tasks whether through written expression or problem solving.
- Affective Networks indicate how we get motivated, engaged, and excited about learning
Source: Universal Design For Learning Center
David H. Rose’s protégé: Sonny Magana
Sonny Magana is the author of Disruptive Classroom Technologies and designer of a tertiary framework for disruptive learning in today’s classroom. Teachers are encouraged to rethink the way technology is used- and he goes far beyond the “digital worksheet.” Magana calls for transformational and transcendent education through the use of technology. What is a transcendent use of technology? Magana argues it’s when students engage with what motivates them (sound familiar?: the affective networks) and use technology to help solve the world’s complex problems.
4.) Carol Dweck: Mindset/ Implicit Theories of Intelligence
- What she’s known for: the Mindset psychological trait
- Educational Application: All Learners of All Ages
- When: 1970s-present
Carol Dweck is best known for her research and contributions to Implicit Theories of Intelligence and Mindset. If we were to select just one word that is the essence of her work we would pick change. Dweck argues that as learners and creators, we are more malleable that we may give ourselves credit. Even trees that are rooted deep in the earth grow, talk to each other, and continue to change. Though as years pass and we look at that same tree do we see its growth or do we see it as a fixed entity planted firmly to the earth? Dweck encourages us to see the growth no matter what the age. She encourages her audience to believe in change, and to love the process. Incremental theory deals with a growth mindset- our belief that we can achieve our own greatness through hard work and perseverance. As opposed to a fixed mindset where students essentially plateau and withdraw from change. Change can expose weakness, change can mean making mistakes. Change can take time, and change doesn’t always happen quickly. Students who engage with a fixed mindset are often afraid to fail, and what happens when they stagnate? Well, if we are using that tree analogy- a tree that isn’t growing and changing is dead. Students who remain in a fixed mindset essentially kill off or stop the learning process. That’s pretty heavy, right? Well, the second word we would pick when describing Dweck’s body of work is hope. Dweck’s findings rekindle a sense of “YES I CAN!” We like that. We like to think that our state of mind is not permanent and that, when up to a challenge, we too can achieve our biggest dreams.
“The growth mindset was intended to help close achievement gaps, not hide them. It is about telling the truth about a student’s current achievement and then, together, doing something about it, helping him or her become smarter.”
Source:Growth Mindset
Carol Dweck’s protégé: Angela Duckworth
Though in many ways a colleague with Dweck, Angela Duckworth rather than standing on Dweck’s shoulder’s is certainly walking arm-in-arm with Dweck. Duckworth, perhaps best known for her book Grit: The Power of Passion and Perseverance is a MacArthur Genius Fellow who writes about the effects of grit on the brain. What is grit? Grit is a psychological trait that is responsible for getting us to the finish line. Grit encompasses motivation, perseverance, and passion that move us towards longer-term goals. How do celebrities like Oprah Winfrey who come from so little with so much riding against them become successful? The short answer is: a ton of grit!
Teaching and Childhood Pedagogy Theories and its Founders
Teaching and Childhood Pedagogy Theories and its Founders
S. No | Paradigms | Contributors |
1 | Behaviorism | John B. Watson, Ivan Pavlov, B.F. Skinner, E. L. Thorndike, Albert Bandura |
2 | Cognitivism | Noam Chomsky, Marriner David Merill , Charles Reigeluth , Robert Mills Gagné , Jerome Bruner, Roger Schank |
3 | Constructivism | Lev S Vygotsky, Jean Piaget, John Dewey , Jerome Seymour, Bruner |
4 | Humanism | Abraham Maslow, Carl Rogers, Malcolm Knowles |
Teaching and Childhood Pedagogy Theories
CONSTRUCTIVIST, SOCIAL AND SITUATIONAL THEORIES | ||
1. | Cognitive Apprenticeship | (Collins et al.) |
2. | Cognitive Dissonance | (Festinger) |
3. | Communities of Practice | Lave and Wenger |
4. | Connectivism | Siemens, Downes |
5. | Discovery Learning | Bruner |
6. | Ecological Theory of Development | Bronfenbrenner |
7. | Multiliteracies | New London Group |
8. | Semiotics | deSaussure, Barthes, Bakhtin |
9. | Social Development Theory | Vygotsky |
10. | Problem-Based Learning | wood |
Teaching and Childhood Pedagogy Theories
DESCRIPTIVE & META THEORIES | ||
1. | Activity Theory | Vygotsky, Leont’ev, Luria, Engstrom |
2. | Bloom’s Taxonomy | Bloom |
3. | Distributed Cognition | Hutchins |
4. | Social Network Analysis | Scott, Prell |
Teaching and Childhood Pedagogy Theories
CHILD DEVELOPMENT THEORIES | ||
1. | Cognitive development | Jean Piaget |
2. | Psychosocial Development | Erik Erikson |
3. | Social development theory | Lev Vygotsky |
4. | Moral Development | Lawrance Kohlberg |
5. | Attachment Theory | Bowlby |
6. | Cognitive Tools Theory | Egan |
7. | Object Relations Theory | Klein |
8. | Separation-Individuation Theory | Mahler |
9. | Social Learning Theory | Albert Bandura |
Teaching and Childhood Pedagogy Theories
MOTIVATION & HUMANIST THEORIES | ||
1. | ARCS Model of Motivational Design | Keller |
2. | Emotional Intelligence | Goleman |
3. | Experiential Learning | Kolb |
4. | Intrinsically Motivating Instruction | Malone |
5. | Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs | Maslow |
6. | Positive Psychology / PERMA Theory | Seligman |
7. | Self-Determination Theory | Deci and Ryan |
Teaching and Childhood Pedagogy Theories
IDENTITY THEORIES | ||
1. | Erikson’s Stages of Development | Erik Erikson |
2. | Identity Status Theory | Marcia |
3. | Mindset: Fixed vs. Growth Mindset | Dweck |
4. | Narcissism | Kernberg |
5. | Self-Perception Theory | Bem |
6. | Self-Theories: Entity and Incremental Theory | Dweck |
7. | Social Identity Theory | Tajfel, Turner |
8. | Stereotype Threat | Steele |
Teaching and Childhood Pedagogy Theories
LEARNING THEORIES & MODELS | ||
1. | Classical Conditioning | Ivan Pavlov |
2. | Operant Conditioning | B.F. Skinner |
3. | instrumental conditioning | B.F. Skinner |
4. | Social Learning Theory (Bobo doll experiment) | Albert Bandura |
Teaching and Childhood Pedagogy Theories
Learning Methods | ||
1. | Montessori Method | Maria Montessori |
2. | Kindergarden Method | Frobel |
3. | Playway Method | Frobel |
4. | Heuristic Method | Henery Armstrong |
5. | Dalton Method | Helean Parkhast |
6. | Project Method | William Kill Patrick,John Dewey |
7. | Inductive Method | Farancis Beckon |
8. | Deductive Method | Aristotle |
9. | Basic Education System | Mahatma Gandhi |
Teaching and Childhood Pedagogy Theories
COGNITIVIST THEORIES | ||
1. | Attribution Theory | Weiner |
2. | Cognitive Load Theory | Sweller |
3. | Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning | Mayer |
4. | Elaboration Theory | Reigeluth |
5. | Expertise Theory | Ericsson, Gladwell |
6. | Functional Context Theory | Sticht |
7. | Gestalt Theory | von Ehrenfels |
8. | Information Processing Theory Metacognition | Flavell |
9. | Theory of Mind, Empathy, Mind blindness | Premack, Woodruff, Perner, Wimmer |
Teaching and Childhood Pedagogy Theories
Intelligence Theories | ||
1. | Uni factor theory | Binet,Terman & Stern |
2. | Two Factor theory | Spearman |
3. | Three factor theory | Spearman |
4. | Multifactor theory | Thorndike |
5. | Group Factor Theory | Thurstone |
6. | Tri-dimensional theory | Guilford |
7. | Chronological/Hierarchical Theory | Vernon |
8. | Fluid And Crystallized Theory | Cattell & Horn |
9. | Information Processing Theory of Intelligence | Sternberg |
10. | Theory of Mental Functioning | Arther Jensen |
11. | Theory Of Multiple Intelligence | Howard Gardener |
12. | Structural Theory | Eysenck |
13. | Biological Theory | Ceci |
14. | Theory Of Emotional Intelligence | Goleman |
15. | Das’s PASS Model | Das |
Teaching and Childhood Pedagogy Theories
Intelligence Tests | ||
1. | Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales | |
2. | Wechsler-Adult Intelligence Scale | |
3. | Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children(WISC-V) | 6.0–17.11 years |
4. | Wechsler Primary & Preschool Scale of Intelligence | |
5. | Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Cognitive Abilities, | |
6. | Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children | |
7. | Raven’s Progressive Matrices | |
8. | Cattell Culture Fair III | |
9. | Reynolds Intellectual Assessment Scales | |
10. | Multidimensional Aptitude Battery II | |
11. | Das–Naglieri cognitive assessment system | |
12. | Differential Ability Scales (DAS-II) | : 2.6–17.11 years |
13. | Universal Nonverbal Intelligence | 5.0–17.11 years |
14. | Wechsler Individual Achievement Test (WIAT-III) | : 4.0–50.11 years |
15. | Peabody Individual Achievement Test | 5–22.11 years |
Teaching and Childhood Pedagogy Theories
Intelligence Tests developed in India | ||
1. | CIE Verbal Group Test of Intelligence | Uday Shankar |
2. | Group Test of General Mental Ability | S. Jalota |
3. | Group Test of Intelligence | Prayag Mehta |
4. | The Bihar Test of Intelligence | S.M. Mohsin |
5. | Group Test of Intelligence | Bureau of Psychology, Allahabad |
6. | Indian Adaptation of Stanford-Binet Test (Third Edition) | S.K. Kulshrestha |
7. | Test of General Mental Ability (Hindi) | M.C. Joshi. |
8. | CIE Non-verbal Group Test of Intelligence | CIE |
9. | Bhatia’s Battery of Performance Tests | Bhatia |
10. | Draw-a-Man Test | Pramila Pathak |
11. | Adaptation of Wechsler Adult Performance Intelligence Scale |
R. Ramalingaswamy |
Teaching and Childhood Pedagogy Theories
Personality Theories | ||
1. | Psychoanalytic theory | Sigmund Freud |
2. | 16PF Trait theory | Cattell |
3. | Self Theory | Rogers |
4. | Eysenck’s Personality Theory | Eysenck |
5. | Allport’s theory of personality | Allport |
Teaching and Childhood Pedagogy Theories
Personality Tests | ||
1. | Self-report Measures | Allport |
2. | The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) |
Hathaway and McKinley |
3. | Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MPI) | Mallick and Joshi |
4. | Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ) | Eysenck |
5. | The Rorschach Inkblot Test | Hermann Rorschach |
6. | The Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) | Morgan and Murray |
7. | Sentence Completion Test | Herman Ebbinghaus |
8. | Rosenzweig’s Picture-Frustration Study (P-F Study) | Rosenzweig |
9. | Draw-a-Person Test | Florence Goodenough |
HTET MOCK TESTS
Discover more from Easy Notes 4U Academy
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.